You should be able to approve expenses with missing coding. This was allowed before and now after an update its disallowed. Not all approvers understand the general ledger chart of accounts. Having these approvers code the expense causes a lot of miscoding errors. The coding can happen before the expenses are moved to a batch.
Company | Berghammer Construction Corp |
Job Title / Role | Dir. of Accounting |
I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2024 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Yeah or be able to reject the expense because it isn't coded. The submitter can then code and re-submit. I was told "Thank you for providing the requested information! I've checked with our Product team and found out that this is the expected behavior. You'll need to add coding to the expense before you reject it." Which doesn't make any sense at all. How would you code it with out contacting each individual submitter.