With five service companies, we need to be able to restrict the SMCo a user can view by the PRCo. This is a setting in most modules but not in Field Service. We cannot have someone in one company accessing information in another company. It would also helpful if there was an "Admin" setting in the portal that could have an Employee Group assigned to it that would allow someone in this group to view all information, regardless of the PRCo, basically bypassing the PRCo restriction. Currently, when training users on the modules that have this setting (Purchase Orders, Progress Entry, etc.) I have to toggle the setting off to conduct the training and then turn it back on.
Tracy Hackett
| Company | MMC Corp |
| Job Title / Role | Enterprise Applications Trainer |
| I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2024 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
This is sweet! How would you feel if instead of SMCO to PRCO we did it with groups instead.